A Bold Stand: How Two NDC Ministers Exposed Justice System Abuses and Why Their Silence Demands Scrutiny

Politics

20 June, 2026

Editorial: # A BoldStand: Two NDC Ministers Expose Justice System Abuses

**Date:** June 20 2026
**Author:** Ghanamma Editorial

—

## Key Excerpts

> “Currently, remand is massively abused. With the least provocation, they say they’ve remanded somebody. You go to the police, and they remand people anyhow.” – *Mohammed Mubarak Muntaka, Minister for the Interior*

> “In Ghana today, we have seen excesses; excesses from the Police, excesses from the Courts, excesses from EOCO denying persons bail and using bail as punishment for accused persons. That is not law!” – *Haruna Iddrisu, Minister of Education*

> **Community Service Bill** – proposed remedy by Muntaka to reduce reliance on remand, ease prison congestion, and restore fairness.

—

## Ministerial Critiques

### Interior Minister – **Mohammed Mubarak Muntaka**
– **Venue:** Parliament House, Accra (May 28 2026)
– **Core concerns:**
– **Massive abuse of remand and bail procedures** – suspects are detained with minimal justification.
– **Excessively stringent bail conditions** (high fees, arbitrary restrictions, prolonged detention) that punish the accused before trial, violating the constitutional presumption of innocence.
– **Proposed solution:** **Community Service Bill** to:
– Reduce dependence on remand.
– Alleviate prison overcrowding.
– Restore fairness to the justice system.

### Education Minister – **Haruna Iddrisu**
– **Venue:** Funeral of Dr. Mahama Sayibu, Tamale (May 28 2026)
– **Core concerns:**
– **Excesses by police, courts, and the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO)** in denying bail and using bail as punitive measures.
– Such practices **undermine the rule of law** and erode public confidence.
– **Call to action:**
– Respect human rights.
– Ensure **fair bail determinations**.
– Uphold **equality before the law** regardless of political affiliation or social status.

—

## NDC’s Silence – Key Questions

1. **Endorsement?** Does the party’s lack of response imply agreement with the abuses?
2. **Timing:** Why speak only after months/years of alleged abuses?
3. **Possible motives:**
– Avoiding political backlash.
– Waiting for external pressure before intervening.
– Internal suppression by party directives.
– Coordinated effort (both statements delivered on the same day).

—

## Broader Implications

– **Institutional vs. partisan:** The abuses appear **systemic**, not limited to one party; two senior NDC lawyers publicly condemn them.
– **Erosion of trust:** Prolonged detention without trial and arbitrary bail undermine confidence in the judiciary, fueling crime and political instability.
– **Presidential influence:** Historical precedent (President Mahama’s 2025 veto of reforms to the Office of the Special Prosecutor) shows the President can intervene; the ministers’ silence may indicate no such backing.

—

## Call for Accountability & Reform

– The ministers’ dissent is a **public service**; their courage should be **recognized and rewarded**.
– Immediate actions needed:
– **Legislative reform** (e.g., Community Service Bill).
– **Independent oversight** of police and judicial processes.
– **Transparent bail procedures** that respect the presumption of innocence.
– The NDC’s continued silence is **unacceptable**; pressure must be applied to compel party leadership to act.

—

## Related Posts (for context)

– *A Bold Stand: Two NDC Ministers’ Unflinching Criticism of Justice System Abuse Demands Recognition*
– *We Keep Saying ‘Africa Forward.’ It’s Time To Say What Forward Means*
– *Award Schemes And Matters Arising: The Great Ghanaian Illusion We Have Condoned For Generations*

Image Source: GHANAMMA