A recent uproar regarding CCTV footage purportedly showing a clandestine meeting between lawyer Thaddeus Sory and Supreme Court judges has been met with a strong rebuttal from Edudzi Kudzo Tameklo, a legal practitioner and a leading voice within the NDC. Tameklo asserts that the footage, far from revealing impropriety related to petitions seeking the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, actually exposes what he describes as “political mischief” on the part of the NPP. Having reviewed the footage, Tameklo contends that it paints a vastly different picture than the one being presented, arguing that the claims of a secret meeting are unfounded and aimed at undermining the court’s integrity. The controversy underscores the heightened sensitivity surrounding judicial matters and the potential for misinterpretation in the current political climate. This account aims to provide a detailed examination of Tameklo’s explanation, dissecting the events depicted in the CCTV recording and evaluating his counter-arguments against the NPP’s allegations, particularly regarding the actions of Thaddeus Sory.
According to Edudzi Kudzo Tameklo, the core of the NPP’s argument crumbles upon closer inspection of the actual events captured on camera.
Tameklo’s Detailed Account of the Restaurant CCTV Footage
Sory and Dzani’s Dinner: A Casual Encounter?
Tameklo explains that the CCTV footage primarily shows Thaddeus Sory engaged in a dinner conversation with businessman Kotei Dzani. The footage depicts a typical restaurant setting, with the two men conversing in a relaxed manner. There is nothing to suggest any covert activity or secret agenda in their interaction. Tameklo emphasizes that this initial context is crucial to understanding the subsequent events.
Justice Kulendi’s Brief Greeting: A Chance Encounter or Something More?
Further elaborating, Tameklo states that Justice Kulendi is seen entering the restaurant, briefly greeting both Dzani and Sory, before proceeding to join a separate group. He highlights the fleeting nature of this interaction, underscoring that it was a casual greeting rather than a planned meeting. He said, “What the video reveals is a simple moment of civility, not a clandestine meeting.”
A Customary Greeting: Legal Fraternity Etiquette
Tameklo further contextualizes Sory’s gesture of greeting another judge, emphasizing it as a standard practice within the legal community. He suggests that such interactions are commonplace and reflect professional courtesy rather than any illicit intent. This point is central to his argument that the NPP is attempting to misrepresent ordinary professional conduct as something more sinister.
Key Takeaways from Tameklo’s Analysis
No Private or Formal Meeting: The Footage’s Revelation
Central to Tameklo’s rebuttal is his assertion that the footage demonstrably shows the absence of any private or formal meeting between Thaddeus Sory and the judges. He argues that the public setting and the brief, incidental nature of the interactions contradict the allegations made by the NPP. He invites the public to examine the footage themselves and draw their own conclusions.
The Courtesy Exchange: Standard Practice in the Legal Field
Tameklo reiterates that the interaction witnessed was a simple exchange of courtesy, a common occurrence among legal professionals. He dismisses the notion that such an interaction should be interpreted as evidence of collusion or impropriety. He argues this type of courtesy is a normal part of the legal world.
Justice Pwamang’s Absence: Addressing Misinformation
Tameklo explicitly points out that Justice Pwamang, who was initially linked to the alleged meeting, is not present in the footage whatsoever. This absence, he argues, further undermines the credibility of the NPP’s claims and highlights the extent to which misinformation has been disseminated in this case.
Addressing Justice Asiedu’s initial actions
Tameklo sheds light on a crucial detail: Justice Asiedu initially passed by without recognizing Sory’s presence. Tameklo claims this detail as further evidence against the idea of a coordinated meeting, suggesting that if the meeting had been prearranged, Justice Asiedu would have immediately acknowledged Sory.
Examining the Second CCTV Clip
Straightforward Entry and Exit: Disproving Secrecy
According to Tameklo, the second CCTV clip, which focuses on the entrance of the restaurant, reveals the judges entering and leaving in a completely normal manner. He argues that this contradicts any suggestion of secretive behavior or an attempt to conceal their presence. The clip, he says, shows routine actions that are inconsistent with the NPP’s narrative.
Accusations of a False Narrative
Tameklo’s Charge of ‘Political Mischief’
Tameklo directly accuses the NPP of deliberately fabricating a false narrative to damage the integrity of the court. He believes the accusations were politically motivated. He stated, “All the noise around this so-called dinner is just political mischief.”
Edudzi Kudzo Tameklo’s analysis, supported by his interpretation of the CCTV footage, casts significant doubt on the claims of a secret meeting between Thaddeus Sory and Supreme Court judges. He encourages the public to assess the footage independently, suggesting the incident reflects a chance encounter and professional courtesy. His accusation of “political mischief” emphasizes the risk of misinformation and the need to critically evaluate claims that could undermine the judiciary and reputation of legal professional Thaddeus Sory.
Image Source: MYJOYONLINE
