Bank of Ghana's Islamic Banking Rebrand Sparks Debate

The Bank of Ghana’s (BoG) recent exposure draft on the regulation and supervision of Non-Interest Banking (NIB) has sparked debate, particularly regarding its branding and potential for systemic challenges. While the BoG’s attempt to avoid controversy – similar to that experienced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in 2011 – by rebranding “Islamic Banking” as “Non-Interest Banking” is understandable, experts argue it has created unnecessary technical confusion.

The draft seeks to distance NIB from religious connotations by prohibiting religious symbolism in branding (Paragraph 85), yet simultaneously mandates adherence to the Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) standards (Paragraph 6). This apparent contradiction raises concerns about the sector’s identity, as AAOIFI is explicitly an Islamic financial institution.

The proposed governance structure, divided between an internal Non-Interest Banking Advisory Committee (NIBAC) and an external Non-Interest Financial Advisory Council (NIFAC), is predicted to lead to conflicts between secular prudential norms and religious stipulations. Concerns also surround the “Windows” model, allowing conventional banks to offer NIB products, and the potential for cross-contamination and regulatory arbitrage.

Specifically, conventional banks could exploit the fungibility of capital to benefit from tax advantages associated with NIB, without fully adhering to the risk-sharing principles central to its foundation. The draft, building on the Banks and Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions Act, 2016 (Act 930) established after the microfinance crises of the early 2010s, aims to address a growing demand for NIB products and services.

However, critics point out the strategy of re-labeling Islamic finance as “Non-Interest” is superficial. The definition of “Non-Interest Banking” itself is circular, relying on “Non-Interest Banking and Finance (NIBF) sources” without providing a clear, independent definition (Paragraph 7). Furthermore, the contracts defined within the guideline – Mudarabah, Gharar, and Maysir – are rooted in classical Islamic Fiqh (jurisprudence) and lack a foundation in Ghanaian statutory law.

This reliance on Arabic legal terms without a specific “Islamic Banking Act” creates uncertainty, potentially requiring Ghanaian judges to interpret religious law. The draft also raises concerns about the prohibition of religious symbols (Paragraph 85), which may hinder the ability of NIBs to build trust with their target demographic – the pious unbanked – who often rely on such signifiers to confirm a bank’s adherence to Shariah principles.

The Exposure Draft’s equation of “Riba” with “interest” is another point of contention. Islamic jurisprudence defines Riba more broadly than simply interest, potentially leading to regulatory loopholes. Moreover, the strict ban on “interest” could create friction with the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) regarding tax deductions.

The creation of NIBAC and NIFAC, though intended to ensure compliance, presents further challenges. NIBAC’s remuneration being determined by the board it is supposed to police poses a classic principal-agent problem. Additionally, the draft suggests assigning adjudicatory roles to NIBAC, potentially violating principles of natural justice.

Liquidity management also appears to be a significant concern. The prohibition on investing in interest-bearing securities – the primary liquidity management tool for Ghanaian banks – could lead to a “cash drag” and reduced profitability for NIBs. The draft doesn’t address issuing Sukuk (Islamic Bonds) or a Shariah-compliant Liquidity Facility by the Central Bank to resolve this lack of means.

Finally, questions surround the capital adequacy calculations for NIBs, as conventional Basel II/III rules may not accurately reflect the risks associated with Islamic financial contracts. Without specific adjustments or a clear resolution mechanism for conflicting standards, the NIB sector risks facing significant regulatory hurdles. Experts warn that without a comprehensive legal framework and a willingness to acknowledge the Islamic heritage of this type of finance, Ghana’s NIB sector could become a “zombie” industry – administratively alive but functionally irrelevant.

Image Source: MYJOYONLINE