The Director of Legal Affairs for the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Godwin Edudzi Tameklo, has publicly supported the injunction application filed by suspended Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo. The application seeks to restrain two justices from participating in the inquiry into her conduct, a move that has drawn significant attention within Ghana’s legal community. Tameklo, speaking on Citi FM, offered a perspective emphasizing due process and the suspended Chief Justice’s opportunity to experience the justice system she once oversaw. Tameklo’s remarks provide context to the Chief Justice’s suspension, shedding light on the complexities of the legal challenge.

Justice Torkornoo’s suspension, enacted by President John Mahama under Article 146 of the Constitution following a petition for her removal, underscores the constitutional mechanisms for addressing judicial conduct concerns. A central aspect of her legal challenge involves contesting the inclusion of Justices Gabriel Scott Pwamang and Samuel Asiedu in the inquiry process. Her challenge arises from an alleged private meeting between these two justices and a lawyer involved in the matter. The legal challenge is further strengthened by the fact that former Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame filed the application on her behalf.

Tameklo described the injunction application as “quite refreshing,” noting the nature of the reliefs being sought and the injunction request itself. This suggests that the legal strategy employed by the suspended Chief Justice is strategically sound and worthy of attention. But more significantly, Tameklo emphasized that the suspended Chief Justice now has the opportunity to experience the very justice system she once led. He stated, “I’m happy that the suspended Chief Justice is going to have the benefit of how the justice system works. Just like any one of us, her leadership may need the benefits of the very justice she, together with others, over the years, delivered to people.” Tameklo also conveyed his anticipation for fair proceedings, aligning with constitutional provisions. He stated: “It is my hope and belief that she will be given all the opportunities required under our constitution as a citizen of this country. I think it’s quite refreshing.”

This case surrounding the suspended Chief Justice raises significant questions about public confidence in the judiciary and the fundamental importance of maintaining impartiality within the legal system. These proceedings will test the robustness of Ghana’s legal system and its commitment to due process, extending even to its highest-ranking judicial officer. The outcome of this case could potentially set a precedent for future inquiries into judicial conduct, shaping the landscape of judicial accountability in Ghana.

The Supreme Court is now tasked with ruling on the injunction application, determining whether the two justices should be restrained from participating in the inquiry. Depending on the court’s decision, the inquiry into the suspended Chief Justice’s conduct will proceed, which may potentially lead to further legal challenges and appeals. The entire process will remain under intense public scrutiny, with far-reaching implications for the judiciary’s reputation and the public’s trust in the legal system.

Godwin Edudzi Tameklo’s support for the suspended Chief Justice’s injunction application highlights the complexities and legal nuances surrounding this case. His emphasis on due process and fair proceedings demonstrates the importance of upholding constitutional principles, even amidst challenging circumstances. The outcome of this legal battle will have significant ramifications for Ghana’s judiciary and its dedication to justice. Following these developments closely is crucial to ensuring transparency and accountability in the pursuit of justice.